Casey Anthony Trial Choose Thought Jury Had Sufficient Proof For Homicide Conviction

The choose who presided over Casey Anthony’s homicide trial thinks prosecutors made a powerful sufficient case to win a conviction … however he is giving her legal professionals props for his or her technique.

Choose Belvin Perry Jr. joined us Thursday on “TMZ Stay,” and we requested if he was stunned the jury acquitted Casey of homicide, manslaughter and little one abuse following 2-year-old daughter Caylee‘s dying. Casey was solely discovered responsible of mendacity to cops.

Perry Jr. says he thought prosecutors introduced sufficient proof for the jury to convict Casey … however nonetheless, he wasn’t shocked when the jury acquitted her, as a result of he is discovered there aren’t any locks in the case of felony trials.

Choose Perry Jr. is now retired from the bench, and instructed us a number of what Casey’s saying in a brand new Peacock documentary is identical “crap” she floated through the trial. After all, she was acquitted, however Perry says that does not imply the jury purchased what Casey was saying again then.

As a substitute, he provides credit score to her protection attorneys, Jose Baez and Cheney Mason, who “littered that case with as a lot affordable doubt as they presumably might.”

Casey did not take the stand through the trial and is now giving her model of occasions in an upcoming Peacock documentary — however the former choose instructed us there are all types of issues together with her claims, the brand new ones and the previous ones.